- History Investor
- ButWhatFor? Four for Friday | No. 040
ButWhatFor? Four for Friday | No. 040
Not a Tragedy, Suggestions, Better Brainstorming, and a Country Churchyard
Welcome to all our new subscribers! ButWhatFor? is about anything, as long as it’s interesting. Thanks for joining!
The Friday email discusses things from others. Original long-form pieces are shared from time to time. If you enjoy the newsletter, please forward it to a few friends/colleagues or click here to share it on Twitter!
ButWhatFor? Four for Friday
One Quote: Not a Tragedy
One Long: Suggestions
One Short: Better Brainstorming
One Extra: Country Churchyard
PAUSE ➜ Sorry! Two Things
First - I am in the UK this week and my schedule is a bit tight, so this week's text will be a bit shorter than normal... and maybe that is a positive thing? 😂
Second - So, last week I put an embedded video link in the Friday email.
That was a mistake.
I heard from a few subscribers that last week's email went to at least a few junk folders - so, sorry about that. The open rate was about 2/3rds of normal - meaning it sounds like that might have happened to quite a few of you. No more embedded YouTube videos going forward!
You can find last week's issue here: ButWhatFor? Four for Friday | No. 039
Long-time subscribers will know that I have a soft spot for Charlie Munger's one-liners. I think this one popped up on Twitter earlier this week as a reminder that the best thing to do is that best that you can do - and that comparing to how others are getting along is generally only a consistent way to find yourself demotivated.
A while back, I wrote about the story of Eric Haney, a special forces operator from Delta Force. He approached the down-selection trials before special forces selection the same way:
Theodore Roosevelt also said something similar:
So, maybe there is something to that idea...
Other articles based on Charlie Munger:
As I mentioned above, I have had less time than normal outside of work due to travel this week - so, I didn't really stumble across anything worth sharing that would be considered a long-read.
But - what about on your end? Did anything you read this week stand out as particularly interesting?
If so and you want to share, send me a link to it / picture / etc with a short note about what you found interesting. If a good fit for this audience, I will pick one or a few to share with everyone next week, along with your comments about what you found interesting.
Right now, we don't have comments working on the new BeeHiiv platform - so if you just reply to this email, I will get it.
Making Brainstorming Better
My colleagues make fun of me for still getting the printed version of the Economist... probably because I also have a habit of tearing out pages and leaving them on people's desk... I understand that just sending a link to the online article would be more efficient and scale better for sharing across the team...
But, that is not nearly as fun... so I will continue to tear out pages!
As to the article pictured above - one of the things that I have struggled with over time is having truly effective brainstorming sessions on important topics. If an organization has the wrong culture, is overly political, or needlessly hierarchical, you just end up with either confirmation of whatever the senior person thinks or a game of politics.
The article was an interesting summary of ways to approach brainstorming to see if you can have more effective outcomes - but if you are short on time, the last paragraph has some interesting ideas in takeaway form.
I had a rather long flight earlier this week, which is great because I tend to not sleep effectively on planes. That would be simpler and make life easier, so my brain thinks this is something best avoided.
I've had Christopher Hitchens' book, Thomas Paine's Rights of Man, on my bookshelf for a while and given Paine was born in the UK, as was Hitchens, I figured I would take the short-ish book along for the ride. Through the ins-and-outs of being half-asleep and half-not-asleep, I managed to work my way through most of the book. Paine is an interesting character and it is unfortunate that, on a relative basis, few American's understand his role in building the frameworks that ultimately led to the creation of the United States of America - a name first used to refer to the collective colonies as a whole, per Hitchens, by Paine himself.
Near the beginning of the short biography, Hitchens quotes a poem by Thomas Gray, a well-known English poet from the 1700s. Gray was somewhat atypical for a famous poet, for he published less than 1,000 lines of poetry across 13 poems in his lifetime despite being popular in his day and offered awards / lucrative literature-related positions in academia.
Hitchens pulls the above stanzas as a reminder that, despite Paine's innate talents, it was not inevitable that he should have impacted the world. Nor was it a given that he would be remembered by the world if he did have an influence - as I mentioned above, he is often not remembered beyond middle school history classes.
Paine had many choices over time based on chance decisions begetting additional chances to make new decisions. The choice to settle down in the English country side when it looked like life could have been simple and comfortable, not attending that party where he met Benjamin Franklin, or choosing to quiet down when his first pamphlets on the rights of men, women, and slaves to choose their own government representation landed him in legal trouble were but a few instances that could have relegated Paine to insignificance if he had done differently.
But, at the same time, for every Thomas Paine, or John Hampden - an English politician that opposed arbitrary taxation and was consequently a favorite reference of the colonists in what would become the United States - or Oliver Cromwell - who ruled Britain after leading the anti-Royalists against King Charles I - there are countless individuals who had equal or greater capabilities that are nevertheless forgotten in the graves of small country churchyards because exceptional outcomes are more chance than they are effort.
But, exceptional outcomes shouldn't be how you define success. And that is what Hitchens was getting at. A man who stood for the right things happened to make a difference that bettered the world because chance intersected with someone who was doing what was right. You can't control chance, but you can be focused on doing the right things.
So, to steal from what I wrote in the article on Eric Haney from the Quote section above:
If you made it all the way down here, please take a moment to share it with someone that might find it interesting — I appreciate your support greatly!
🚨📬 IMPORTANT: To make sure my emails hit your inbox and don't get lost in junk/spam, I recommend taking these quick steps:
Gmail users: Move the newsletter to your primary inbox:
On your phone: Hit the 3 dots (...) at the top right corner of the app, click "Move to" then "Primary". If you don't see Primary, you're already set
On desktop: Back out of this email, drag & drop this email into the "Primary" tab on the top left of the screen
Apple mail users:
Tap on the email address at the top of this email (next to "From:" on mobile) and click "Add to VIP"
Everyone else on other email clients:
Follow these instructions
Have a great weekend,
See here for a full archive of But What For? articles
But What For? Because anything can be interesting